Custom solutions
If it's assessed against criteria, it can run on Sokros.
Licensing decisions, compliance reviews, certification schemes, professional standards — wherever experts apply written criteria to submitted evidence, we build the system that does it defensibly.
Four phases. No leap of faith.
Every phase is gated by your own experts' judgement — the system earns trust the same way a new assessor would.
1
Define
We sit with your experts and write the criteria down as they actually decide — including the unwritten rules everyone “just knows”.
2
Encode
Hard requirements become declarative checks; graded judgement becomes rubric-anchored evaluation with written reasoning. Rules where rules exist, judgement where it's needed.
3
Calibrate
The system runs against decisions your experts already made — measured in dozens of examples, not thousands — until the outputs agree and the disagreements are explainable.
4
Ship with the trail
It goes live with the audit record built in: every input, check, verdict and reason stored, replayable, and answerable — because regulated work gets questioned.
You bring
- The criteria — a rubric, a standard, a checklist, or the expert who carries it in their head
- Examples of decided cases — approvals, referrals, ratings your experts stand behind
- The official output format — the certificate, report or sheet your regulator already accepts
You get
- ✓A pipeline tuned to your workflow — deterministic where rules exist, reasoned where judgement is needed
- ✓Outputs in your official format, with every decision evidence-linked
- ✓The full audit record: retrievable per case, replayable per release, deployable on your infrastructure
Tell us what you certify.
A scoping call is usually enough to know whether the pattern fits — and what calibration would take.